<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Except&#8221; clause in 18 U.S.C. Section 924(c) does not limit consecutive sentences and does not violate the Double Jeopardy clause.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.swartzlenamon.com/whitecollarblog/except-clause-in-18-usc-section-924c-does-not-limit-consecutive-sentences-and-does-not-violate-the-double-jeopardy-clause/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.swartzlenamon.com/whitecollarblog/except-clause-in-18-usc-section-924c-does-not-limit-consecutive-sentences-and-does-not-violate-the-double-jeopardy-clause</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	</channel>
</rss>
