<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Court finds U.S.S.G. Section 2246(D) clearly indicates that Congress used the phrase &#8220;any person&#8221; when it meant to include the offender himself, as well as another individual, and the phrase &#8220;another person&#8221; when it meant to exclude the offender.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.swartzlenamon.com/whitecollarblog/supreme-court-finds-ussg-section2246d-clearly-indicates-that-congress-used-the-phrase-any-person-when-it-meant-to-include-the-offender-himself-as-well-as-another-individual-and-the-phrase/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.swartzlenamon.com/whitecollarblog/supreme-court-finds-ussg-section2246d-clearly-indicates-that-congress-used-the-phrase-any-person-when-it-meant-to-include-the-offender-himself-as-well-as-another-individual-and-the-phrase</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 05:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	</channel>
</rss>
