Posts Tagged ‘waiver’

A subject matter jurisdictional question is not waived by a guilty plea.

Monday, May 4th, 2009

U. S. v. BETANCOURTH, 07-14710, (January 13, 2009)

The defendant pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute five kilograms of cocaine and to possession with intent to distribute five kilograms of cocaine while on board a vessel subject to the jurisdiction of the United States in violation of 46 U.S.C. § 70501.

Prior to the plea, the defendant moved to dismiss the indictment arguing that the government could not prosecute him because the Equadorian government had not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction over the Equadorian vessel which the United States government had seized. The district court found that Ecuador did consent to the United States’ exercise of jurisdiction.

On appeal, the Eleventh Circuit determined that because the defendant entered an unconditional plea, this ordinarily would have waived the issue, however a subject matter jurisdiction challenge that can not be waived by a guilty plea. Nevertheless, the Court found the district court was correct.

The defendant waived his challenge to a faulty Information by agreeing to proceed to trial.

Monday, April 27th, 2009

U.S. v. BRANNAN, 2009 WL 736005 (11th Cir. March 23, 2009)

Evidently indecent exposure was a big problem in the Wheeler National Wildlife Refuge in Northern Alabama as it led to Mr. Brannan’s arrest by Federal Wildlife officers who conducted a “covert operation” posing as members of the public walking trails and sitting on park benches. On appeal, the defendant claimed the charging Information was defective because it left out an essential element of the crime by omitting the requirement that the jury find the “sexual act was committed without consent of the victim,” an element of the offense under applicable Alabama law. The appellate court rejected the claim, on the Invited Error Doctrine, finding the defendant encouraged the district court to proceed to trial, knowing the count was incorrect and did not ask for a dismissal at that time.